Federal Criminal Investigators Association

 

Home
What's New
Member Benefits
Washington Report
Disability Legislation
Membership
Chapter News
Job Opportunities
FCIA Logo Items
Annual Meeting
Library
Fed. Invest. Links

Washington Report

 

FCIA Legislative Initiatives

Community Protection Act
Premium Conversion
GPO and WEP
Pay Compression
Law Enforcement Retirement

FCIA
Legislative Initiatives

We, the members of the FCIA, and our family members and friends, need to write to our Representatives and Senators to tell them that we expect them to support these bills. See the article below on how to contact Members of Congress.

To check on whether your Representative or Senator is supporting us, go to the Thomas web site at http://thomas.loc.gov/

Premium Conversion HR 1110 & S 773

FCIA is working on behalf of members receiving federal annuities who now are required to pay their federal health benefits insurance premiums with after tax dollars. This means that the FCIA retiree in many cases are paying over $600 to $900 a year more in premiums than the federal workers who pay their premiums with before tax dollars.

Premiums increased an average of 11 percent this year. The COLAs applied to federal pensions has not kept up with the double-digit increases in the health insurance premiums. FCIA is supporting legislation sponsored by Rep. Tom Davis (R-VA), HR 1110, and Sen. John Warner (R-VA), S 773, to correct this inequity in the law.

Congressman Davis’ bill has 208 cosponsors. Senator Warner’s bill has 39 cosponsors and has been referred to the Senate Finance Committee. Senator Warner and Congressman Davis believe, with the help of the FCIA and other law enforcement organizations, the bill can be enacted in this session of congress.

GPO and WEP HR 82 & S 1254

Other bills the Federal Criminal Investigators Association and also the National Association Retired Federal Employees (NARFE) are advocating are H.R.82 introduced in the House by Representative Buck McKeon (R-CA) and S.1254, introduced in the Senate by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), to entirely repeal the Government Pension Offset and the Windfall Elimination Provision of the Social Security laws. This could make a difference in your yearly income of $5,000 or more!

GPO Legislation was enacted in 1977 to prevent government retirees from collecting both a government annuity based on their own work in non-social security covered employment and social security benefits based on their spouse’s work record. The new law became effective with government employees who were first eligible to retire in December 1982 and later. The law provides that two-thirds of the government annuity offsets whatever social security benefits would be payable to the retired government worker as a spouse (wife, husband, widow, widower). For example, a spouse who receives a civil service benefit of $900 a month based on his/her own earnings applies for a social security widow(er)’s benefit. The widow(er)’s benefit is $500. Two-thirds of his/her annuity, or $600, totally offsets the social security widow(er)’s benefit. He/she therefore receives no widow(er)’s benefit from social security.

WEP The Social Security Act also includes a provision that greatly reduces the social security benefits earned of a retired government worker who has also worked in the private sector and receives a government annuity. Those who became 62 after 1989 may have their social security benefit reduced by as much as 60%. An additional 20% is deducted for taking the social security benefit at age 62.

Pay Compression

Pay caps of SES and GS level ,employees are having a negative effect on the compensation, upward mobility and morale of federal law enforcement agencies. In high cost regions, first line management and GS-14 agents are being effected by the caps.

FCIA believes that these caps should be lifted.

Law Enforcement Retirement

FCIA proposes that law enforcement agents should receive a 2.5% (1.7% for FERS) annuity calculation after twenty years of service and not have it reduced to 2% (1.0% for FERS) for the remaining years of their careers, as it is presently.

If Congress cannot increase the rate to 2.5%, they should, at the very least, reduce the amount agents with more than 20 years service have to pay into the system from 2.5% to the 2%. This is the amount that all other civil service employees pay for the same exact benefit.

On The Job Disability Coverage-

FCIA is continuing to review the coverage afforded to agents disabled on the job and believes that such disabilities should fairly reflect the agents salary and pension contribution.

The disability committee is requesting anecdotes detailing mistreatment and unfair practices relating to on-the-job disabilities of federal criminal investigators. Please mail any correspondence to: FCIA, Disability Chairman, P.O. Box 23400, Washington, D.C. 20026.

Full Law Enforcement Authority For Inspectors General-

FCIA stands for the proposition that all Inspectors General criminal investigators should be granted full statutory law enforcement powers.

Do’s and Don’ts for Successful Advocacy with Congress

When the FCIA Board agreed to hold the 1999 annual meeting in Washington, D.C., it recognized the importance of FCIA’s need to work closely with members of Congress on the concerns of federal investigators. This article is part of a planned series of articles on working effectively to accomplish legislative goals and is reprinted from a publication by Patrick B. Haggerty from Maryland.

Mr. Haggerty begins his tips noting that "Getting elected is a lawmaker’s primary concern. They need us to be elected and re-elected. We need our lawmakers to achieve our legislative and regulatory agenda. Successful citizen legislative advocacy is possible when the reciprocal nature of this relationship is fully understood."

The following DO’s and DON’Ts are an important part of this relationship.

DO

1. Remember that time is precious. All letters, phone calls, office visits, etc. to your lawmaker should be "short and sweet." Get to the point soon and focus on your issue.

2. Include the bill number and/or name of the legislation or regulation in all communication.

3. Explain in simple and straightforward terms the logic supporting your position. The most effective logic often involves jobs, cost, and how many people it will affect.

4. Remember that the lawmaker’s staff is as important to you as the lawmaker. Staff often are the ones who prepare the issue summary, including a vote recommendation, for the lawmaker.

5. Take advantage of "strength in numbers." This is true for letters, faxes, e-mail, phone calls, office visits, financial support, etc. Many issues are decided on the volume of communications received.

6. Remember that the more responsibility and involvement you assume, the more vigorous the commitment and support you can expect from your lawmaker. Know your issue.

7. Include your name, address and phone number (home and office) on all communication. This allows your lawmaker and staff to contact you for appropriate follow-up and it also reminds the lawmaker that you are the constituent.

8. Follow-up with letters, calls, etc. Make a commitment to your cause.

9. Remind your lawmaker how many people (read votes) in your organization share your position.

10. Always have a "position paper" that clearly states your position and logic. This is also called a "leave behind" for office visits. Other effective "leave behinds" are buttons, hats, bumper stickers, etc. to make your visit more memorable to the lawmaker.

11. Include your lawmaker on your organization’s mailing list for newsletters, magazines, etc.

12. Be patient. Sometimes neither you nor the lawmaker will know the outcome for months.

13. Be a good winner and a good loser. Your adversary on one issue might be your ally on the next issue.

14. Invite your lawmaker and staff to your place of business or other appropriate location(s) that will put a human face on the issue you’re discussing.

15. Understand that you and your lawmaker sometimes will have to compromise. Assess what you can realistically achieve in this session and work on the rest later.

16. Ask lawmakers to state their position. If it agrees with yours, ask what you can do to strengthen that support. If it differs with yours, ask what information or show of public support is necessary to change that position. If they’ve not decided, ask what information and public support you can supply to help with the decision making.

17. Use the news media (letters to the editor, guest editorials, news stories, etc.) to help create public support for your positions. Lawmakers are constantly looking to see what "the people want" on issues.

18. Write a thank you note to the lawmaker no matter what the outcome (remember item #13) of your issue.

DON’T

1. Confuse the issues. One issue is as much as you should cover in one letter, call, visit, etc.

2. Use form letters. Form letters are not taken seriously and interpreted as the action of a single person rather than as broad support.

3. Underestimate the weight given to letters and phone calls. Many legislative offices multiply each letter received by 50 (i.e. if they get 200 letters they’re counted as 10,000 letters). Two hundred letters on any issue are considered an avalanche of public support.

4. Use jargon. You’re not speaking to your colleagues in the office. Your lawmaker may have little or no knowledge of your issue or its jargon.

5. Contact a lawmaker and then drop the issue. Persistence pays off.

6. Say you’re contacting your lawmaker because your organization told you to do so. Lawmakers respond to people (voters) not organizations.

7. Ignore opportunities to visit with your lawmaker at home. They may be "King of the Hill" at the Capitol, but they’re "jes folks" at home.

8. Never lie. Anything less than full honesty will erode your lawmakers ability to commit to you and your issue. If there are some rough spots, acknowledge them early and work on avoidance strategy together with your lawmaker.


FCIA’s Washington Director Don Baldwin
with Attorney General John Ashcroft.


Home ] What's New ] Member Benefits ] [ Washington Report ] Disability Legislation ] Membership ] Chapter News ] Job Opportunities ] FCIA Logo Items ] Annual Meeting ] Library ] Fed. Invest. Links ]

Copyright © 2000 Federal Criminal Investigators Association
Last modified: January 27, 2005